• 한국어 (Korean)
  • Thai ไทย (ภาษาไทย)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • Français (France)
  • English (United Kingdom)
Path:HomeForumLeague ForumGeneral • Re-examining the shot-clock rule

공지

본 사이트 사용을 위해 자바스크립트를 허용해야 합니다

Re-examining the shot-clock rule

더 읽기
10 년 2 월 전 #748 작성자 Lenny Erickson
Optional shot clock – revisited.

At the organizational meeting, we voted in the following rule:



Players will now be given the option of using a shot-clock for their games. Before each game, the referee needs to ask the two players if they want to implement a shot-clock for that particular game. If neither player wishes to use a shot-clock, then players may take as long as they wish to make shots during the game. If either player (it does not need to be both players) states that they wish to use a shot-clock, then the following shot-clock rule will go into effect for that game.
Shot-clock rule:
A player will have 90 seconds to strike the cue ball from the moment the cue ball comes to a stop from the previous shot. A player may have one 30-second extension per game. Referees should let the player know when 60 seconds has passed, and then if the player exceeds 90 seconds more than once during the game, it will be considered a foul, and ball in hand will be awarded to their opponent.

At the organizational meeting, it was agreed to examine how this was working, and then decide at the mid-season captains' meeting if we should keep it or alter it in any way.

Now is the time to give us your thoughts regarding this.

Please 로그인 to join the conversation.

더 읽기
10 년 2 월 전 #756 작성자 Mark Barnes
At the first meeting we also all agreed not to be D*cks about it too,
What I have found that what works well is that (being that this rule has been invoked on my team almost every night, save a few.)

-if Both captains time the match together.

-Most teams have concured with allowing the player to address the table before the clock starts, not when the ball comes to a rest. (within a few seconds here or there)

-also allowing the shooting teams Captain to announce 60 seconds has expired, and they have 30 seconds left, that it's a familiar voice should eliviate confrontational Refs.

-once the player is in shooting position, allowing this to satisfy the clock, unless he/she gets up again then it should resume worked well enough.

following these "don't be a D*ck" policies and understanding that the point of timed matches is to speed the night up over all, not give one team an advantage.

Every team I've played has had a positive experience following these guidlines, in lue of being completely strict.
My2Cents

Please 로그인 to join the conversation.

더 읽기
10 년 2 월 전 #788 작성자 Ronan Spillane
The optional shot clock has caused some problems in our matches. Quite often the opposing player/ captain has reacted as if he is being victimized in some way. I can understand that, to be fair. There should be a shot clock for everyone, or no shot clock at all.
Anyway, 90 seconds is way too long if the point of the shot clock is to speed games up! Should be a minute, max.

Please 로그인 to join the conversation.

더 읽기
10 년 2 월 전 #789 작성자 Arnaud Ogier
Agree Ronan,It should be 60 seconds after break, and 30 seconds for all other shots with one time out.

Please 로그인 to join the conversation.

모더레이터: Lenny EricksonDominic Johnson
페이지 생성 시간: 0.037 초

쿠키

우리는 쿠키를 사용하여 학대를 막기 위해 사이트 경험과 보안 문자를 향상시킵니다. 우리는 추적 또는 사용자 식별을 위해 쿠키를 사용하지 않습니다. 자세한 내용은 개인 정보 보호 정책을 읽으십시오.