• Français (France)
  • Thai ไทย (ภาษาไทย)
  • 한국어 (Korean)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • English (United Kingdom)
Path:HomeForumLeague ForumGeneral • Rating Formula

Annonce

Vous devez activer Javascript pour utiliser ce site

Rating Formula

Plus d'informations
il y a 10 ans 1 mois #802 par Bernard Condrau
Réponse de Bernard Condrau sur le sujet Re:Rating Formula
Well Arno, here is the good news. With your current rating, you would need to lose to a 1245 rated player to lose 31 points in one game, and we do not have anyone rated that low in the league. And if we had (such a player), and you would (lose), then you probably would deserve to lose the 31 points.


Good decisions come from experience. Experience comes from making bad decisions. [Samuel Langhorne Clemens]

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

Plus d'informations
il y a 10 ans 1 mois #803 par Arnaud Ogier
Réponse de Arnaud Ogier sur le sujet Re:Rating Formula
Guys when I say 31 pts it's an imaginary (literary meaning) number (with imaginary (math meaning) part =0 ) that you should take as X > Y and Y is too big. Don't always stick on the text but consider the overall idea.

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

Plus d'informations
il y a 10 ans 1 mois #804 par Lenny Erickson
Réponse de Lenny Erickson sur le sujet Re:Rating Formula
Blah, blah, blah.
Good crap, Arno. Now I've got that freaking headache again.
Lenny Erickson.

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

Plus d'informations
il y a 10 ans 1 mois #809 par Arnaud Ogier
Réponse de Arnaud Ogier sur le sujet Re:Rating Formula
Last time I checked score sheet I thought: Paul did really great, one break and run and one 8 ball run the same night. Well when I had a closer look I noticed that he lost some points.I was wondering if we shouldn't give some bonus points for B&R and 8BR like 10 and 5?I guess it was already discussed somewhere sometimes ago.

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

Plus d'informations
il y a 10 ans 1 mois #811 par Bernard Condrau
Réponse de Bernard Condrau sur le sujet Re:Rating Formula
No, we should not. Runs are rewarded with pins, ratings reflect games won or lost, no matter how it was achieved. Paul won his two singles games when rated 436 points higher than his opponent (gained 2 points in rating per game), and then lost his doubles with 369 points higher average rating than his opponents (lost 14 points in rating). Whether his partner screwed up in the doubles game, or Paul had a bad game after 2 great games, or they scratched on the 8, or their opponents played a great game, or... it does not matter, they simply lost the game.


Good decisions come from experience. Experience comes from making bad decisions. [Samuel Langhorne Clemens]

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

Plus d'informations
il y a 10 ans 1 mois #812 par Arnaud Ogier
Réponse de Arnaud Ogier sur le sujet Re:Rating Formula
Bernard I know all of that but I still believe that when you break and run It doesn't depend of the ranking of your opponent, so why taking into account his ranking or only his ranking? Of course, you can always argue that is like that and not otherwise, period. It will not convince me...

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

Temps de génération de la page : 0.032 secondes

Cookies

Nous utilisons des cookies pour améliorer votre expérience de site et CAPTCHA pour prévenir les abus. Nous n'utilisons pas de cookies pour le suivi ou l'identification de l'utilisateur. Veuillez lire notre politique de confidentialité (vos informations personnelles) pour plus de détails.